E is for Entropy
It isn’t that we “just haven’t found” it yet [the so-called
natural process that generates living organisms]. There are in fact very specific natural laws
prohibiting the spontaneous generation of biological systems. The term is entropy. It refers to the
fact that in any natural system, left to its own devices, the system
trends toward disorder. From greater
to lesser order and never the other way around.
For this reason, as we will later discuss – the entire Universe requires a supernatural explanation – as a strict,
logical necessity.
If humans disappeared from the planet, our cities would
crumble almost immediately. If a living
body ceases to live, ceases to
acquire new energy and resources, it will degrade. From order to disorder. These are facts and they don’t operate the
other way around – historically the ‘scientific’ argument has been “well they could operate the other way around” when
in fact they have never been witnessed to do so. And even if something could conceivably
happen, that it is not impossible does
not make it probable, likely, or scientifically viable in the real world.
--%--
As a practical fact, all living organisms are a direct
product of the Cellular assembly mechanisms contained in their ancestor
cells. Every organism that has ever
been witnessed to exist was assembled via the mechanics of the cell, as
directed by the information in DNA. A “first
cause” is needed – one that contains all of the intelligence of the cell, and
perhaps much more.
[Figure x Cellular Assembly]
Nature does not create Organisms any more than Nature
creates automobiles. Or stated
another way, nature has been witnessed
to produce life from non-life as often as it has produced sky scrapers –
which is to say, never in the history of the world. *
*Again, this fact no
one disputes. Material-only sciences
seek to go against the facts and the theory behind them.
Think of automobiles.
Are they intelligently created?
Of course they are… Is this a ‘supernatural’ or mystical
(religious) claim?
Of course it isn’t … it is a practical fact about the source
and cause required to make cars.
[curious case of non-present-day abio-genesis while
advocating “past” abiogenesis].
If it is obvious and not mystical or religious, or a ‘fairy
tale’, that intelligence can create things such as cars and houses and
computers, then Intelligence itself is not a “mystical” or silly or foolish or
outdated concept – but, rather, an irrefutable
reality of the Universe and the world we live in. We are intelligent
– not a metaphor for intelligence. Lest
the word, and hence the distinction have no meaning; a framework that is
unacceptable for there are in fact meaningful distinctions between artifacts
and ‘naturally’ produced items.
We accept automobiles because 1) we made them, but
also 2) they were materially arranged by material-bodied beings (matter
moving matter). The real problem, the
real refusal to conceptualize the origin of life rests in the fact that ENERGY
itself would have to behave intelligently in order to create life. Yet, energy behaves intelligently anyway –
we call it law.
[Quantum Choice] [Max
Planck]
[Max Planck list of
accomplishments]
Is energy behaving orderly
(when it does not have to) any more
radical than energy behaving intelligently? It seems miraculous either way.
The question can be asked another way. Which is more extraordinary, a child speaking
or a child doing physics calculations?
One is mathematical the other logical.
Universal order and individual logos are simply a different
type of intelligence. This is quite like
our own ability to do math or write poems.
One allows for stability of the system, (engineering, infrastructure,
etc.) and the other for creative expression within it (music, poetry, artistic
design)! Incidentally, intelligence
already acts directly upon matter without intermediary (material) causes – and we are the evidence for this.
Neither case violates physical laws, though neither can be
expressed or achieved by fixed causes. CREATIVE causes are required.
No comments:
Post a Comment